Welcome back! I’m cooking my way through the 1929 Photoplay Cookbook (150 recipes of the stars!) and this time around, we’re going to be trying out a plagiarized pudding from a starlet.
You can catch up on all my past taste tests here.
Mary Brian is probably best remembered today for playing Wendy opposite Betty Bronson’s Peter in the 1924 version of Peter Pan. She continued in assorted leading lady roles, made a successful jump to sound (she starred opposite Gary Cooper in The Virginian) and enjoyed decent success during the early-to-mid-1930s before retirement and then a return to poverty row and television.
Okay, so Brian’s career is pretty much standard trajectory for a starlet in old Hollywood: Breakout hit, a few good solo pictures, career decline after a few years and off to poverty row.
So, let’s talk about recipe plagiarism.
Three things struck me as odd: first, why was a twenty-three-year-old making a recipe named after Jenny Lind, the Swedish songbird who had toured the United States over a half-century before she was born? Second, why did the recipe call for wine at the height of Prohibition? The other recipes in the cookbook are careful to shield themselves by calling for “flavoring” or near beer or merely hint at illegal additions. Third, the writing seems exceedingly stiff and formal, far more so than any other recipe in the book.
I started to do some research and soon found that dozens and dozens of dishes were named for Lind, including a totally different pudding. And then I came across a post about Miss Parloa’s New Cook Book and Marketing Guide published in 1880. The quoted recipe for Jenny Lind Pudding was identical to Brian’s, right down to the oddball wording. I took a look at the original publication and confirmed that, yes, this was the exact same recipe.
So, who ripped off Miss Parloa? There are three possibilities:
- Mary Brian realized the recipe was due and grabbed an old cookbook, crossing her fingers that no one would notice. And no one did for nearly nine decades.
- Paramount submitted the recipe on Brian’s behalf, wanting something old-fashioned and wholesome for their leading lady.
- Photoplay couldn’t get a recipe out of either Paramount or Brian and decided to backfill from an old cookbook.
Whichever way it went down, all I can say is… BUSTED!
Okay, so now that we’ve exposed either Brian, Photoplay or Paramount as dirty, rotten recipe plagiarists (surely the scandal of the century), let’s get to work making this recipe. Incidentally, I served it at the Super Bowl. The humor of this will become abundantly clear once you see the finished product.
First, we need soft custard. I used this recipe (doubled) and it turned out very well. You can also use instant pudding, if you’re in a hurry, but the cooked stuff literally took just ten minutes from start to finish and it was deeeeelish! I added four tablespoons of cream sherry once the pudding was off the heat. Cream sherry is my go-to trifle soak. Don’t judge.
Trifle, if you are unfamiliar, is a gorgeous mess of fruit, pudding/custard, cake and alcohol. It’s my thing. Totally my thing. I get marriage proposals when I make trifle but I think that may be because I follow a wise woman’s advise: Don’t be mean with the booze. This Jenny Lind Pudding seemed very much like a coconut trifle, so I treated it accordingly, which meant dusting off my footed trifle dish.
Because the recipe calls for macaroons AND coconut cakes, I took macaroons to mean macarons and coconut cakes to mean macaroons. Confused yet? The point is, I purchased frozen macarons from Trader Joe’s (pretty decent but if you have a good bakery nearby, you would obviously want to grab some from there) and a package of soft coconut macaroons.
And now for the layering. The recipe calls for arranging the cakes in a dish and pouring custard over them but I find that these kinds of recipes benefit from a bit of structure. Here’s how I layered mine:
Because I was preparing this for a crowd, I made an executive decision and cut back on the coconut. A whole cup plus what was inside the macaroons? I wasn’t out to choke my guests, thank you very much. If I make this again, I will use even less and make it toasted. Or perhaps add some chopped macadamia nuts. I compensated for the lost coconut bulk by adding a layer of vanilla macarons.
Anyway, I topped the thing with whipped cream (unsweetened as the whole thing had a lot of sugar already), which was not in the recipe but I added anyway, and the multi-colored/flavored macaroons. And now you see why this was such a funny thing to serve on Super Bowl. Have you ever seen anything more frilly?
My score: 3 out of 5 if prepared as-is. 4 out of 5 if you halve the coconut. 5 out of 5 if you use toasted coconut.
But this was a seriously tasty dessert. Even the reduced coconut amount was a bit choke-inducing but the pudding and other goodies melded together in that wonderful trifle way. You basically end up with a big mess o’ goodness with the ladyfingers softening, the macarons melting and the macaroons adding some chew.
I reckon that it could comfortably feed six to eight as a generous dessert, possibly more if the dinner was large enough. It can easily be made vegan with the right cookies and the non-dairy custard of your choice and, of course, almost anything can be switched out if there are allergies to worry about.
You can easily customize the color and flavor of this dessert with different nuts, crumbles, macaron flavors, etc. I can see a chocolate/hazelnut version being divine. All in all, a smashing success after some tweaks.
Like what you’re reading? Please consider sponsoring me on Patreon. All patrons will get early previews of upcoming features, exclusive polls and other goodies.
You’re a cooking detective! That would be a better ‘reality’ show than anything on-air today. Well, I think so, but I don’t watch reality tee vee outside testing the soup and finding it too pungent.
Thanks! There is a TV show testing vintage recipes but the host is so hyper and affected and loud that I find it unwatchable. Sigh. Too bad, it could have been fun.
Oh now this is interesting, because of all the starlets you could have named, Mary Brian was my life-long, close personal friend – a rare specie in Hollywood, during any era.
Agreed – someone is flat-out busted on this recipe plagiarism scandal – a true moral shocker! 😉
I vote for Guilty Culprit #2 – Paramount Studios, who most likely submitted the recipe on Mary’s behalf. Oh the dirty scoundrels! Studios were so dominant and controlling in the star’s lives – people today have no idea. There was no point in a starlet objecting – the studios owned their stars – lock, stock & barrel. Studios could — and did — issue any press release, article supposedly written by the star, and false rumors about the star, that the studio wished to use to promote their ‘property.’
While Mary might have spent her ‘final years’ on ‘Poverty Row’ Mary actually lead a fulfilling and happy life as a portrait painter, as noted by IMDB. In fact, one of my most treasured possessions is Mary Brian’s portrait of my late husband, Harold “Hal” Smoot. Nothing quite captures the soul, as the eyes in an artist’s portrait. While Hal has long since “left the building” (as these young folks now refer to it), I have Mary Brian’s portrait to keep me company.
Yes, the William Desmond Taylor amateur sleuths can retire– there’s a new scandal in town & it’s the hottest one yet! Of course, we’ll probably never know who submitted the stolen recipe as the Photoplay offices are long gone but that just adds spice to the mystery. I expect a complete Buzzfeed investigation later this year. 😉
Yes, I heard Brian was quite good as an artist and good for her. It’s always nice to hear about people enjoying their time outside the film industry. Splendid about the portrait.
Comments are closed.